The Impact of Democratization and International Exposure on Indonesian Counter-terrorism Policy

Ali Abdullah Wibisono

Abstract

This article explains the influence of international attention - represented by the United States - against Indonesia's policy of responding to terrorism in the reform era. The two main aspects of counter-terrorism serve as a barrier to this international concern, namely the aspect of counter-terrorism effectiveness and compliance aspects to human rights values. Because of the need to securitize the issue of terrorism in the era of democracy, the Indonesian government must adopt human rights values in the belief of the public and the international world. However, the use of human rights values is not done to ensure the preservation of human rights, but rather to justify exceptions in counter-terrorism. Furthermore, cooperation with the United States facilitates the strengthening of counter-terrorism coercive capability in the form of criminal justice system with special capacity in this field. The absence of pressure to seriously consider the protection of human rights in counter-terrorism is one of the contributors to the lack of institutional manifestation of Indonesian counter-terrorism characterized by the absence of a formal document explicitly articulating the counterterrorism strategy (objectives, measures of attainment and instrument) so as to counter Indonesian-terrorism is also absent from evaluation. In the meantime, direct assistance to the Indonesian police and military also made the government - executive and legislative - provide exceptional authorities to the security apparatus without accountability mechanisms in their implementation.

Keywords— counter-terrorism, policy, democracy, international exposure

Full Text:

PDF

References

Aly, A., Balbi, A. M., & Jacques, C. (2015). Rethinking countering violent extremism: implementing the role of civil society. Journal of Policing, Intelligence and Counter Terrorism, 10(1), 3-13.

Article 13, ATL.

Article 55, Penal Code (Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana/ KUHP); Indonesian Penal Code is an inheritance of Dutch Colonial authority and was originally titled Wetboek Van Strafrecht issued on 15 October 1915, accessible from http://www.hukumonline.com/pusatdata/detail/lt4c7b7fd88a8c3/node/38/wetboek-van-strafrecht-%28wvs%29-kitab-undang-undang-hukum-pidana-%28kuhp%29, accessed at 10 January 2010

Blackburn, S. (2004). Women and the state in modern Indonesia. Cambridge University Press., p.205-206.

Butt, S. (2008). Anti-terrorism law and criminal process in Indonesia. University of Melbourne. Centre for Islamic Law and Society. ARC Federation Fellowship.

Burke, A. (2009). Metaterror. International Relations, 23(1), 61-67.

Chilkoti, A. (2016) Terror Threat Tests Indonesia’s Traditional Anti-Terror Stance, Financial Times.

Chowdhury, A. (2011). “The Giver or the Recipient?”: The Peculiar Ownership of Human Rights. International Political Sociology, 5(1), 35-51.

Chowdhury, A., & Krebs, R. R. (2010). Talking about terror: Counterterrorist campaigns and the logic of representation. European Journal of International Relations, 16(1), 125-150.

Christopherson, G. (2002). The War on Terrorism in Southeast Asia Searching for Partners, Delimiting Targets; Strategic Insights: v. 1, issue 1 (March 2002). Strategic Insights, v. 1, issue 1 (Feb.-March 2002).

Clark, I. (2005). Legitimacy in international society. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005, p. 29

Davies, E., & Rondonuwu, O. (2010). US-funded Detachment 88, elite of Indonesia security. Reuters.

Etzioni, A. (2010). Terrorists: a distinct species. Terrorism and Political Violence, 23(1), 1-12.

Evans, T. (2005). International human rights law as power/knowledge. Human Rights Quarterly, 27(3), 1046-1068.

Finnemore, M., & Sikkink, K. (1998). International norm dynamics and political change. International organization, 52(4), 887-917.

Ganor, B. (2012). The use of force to combat terrorism. In Richard Jackson & Samuel Sinclair, Contemporary Debates on Terrorism, New York & Oxon: Routledge.

Glušac, L., Gajin, S., Dimitrijević, V., Račić, O., Đerić, V., Papić, T., ... & Ignjatijef, M. (2001). International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty.(2001). The Responsibility To Protect.

Golder, B., & Williams, G. (2006). Balancing national security and human rights: assessing the legal response of common law nations to the threat of terrorism. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis, 8(01), 43-62.

Held, D. (2004). Global Covenant: The Social Democratic Consensus to the Washington Consensus. Cambridge: Polity Press, p. 137.

Heller, R., Kahl, M., & Pisoiu, D. (2012). The ‘dark’side of normative argumentation–The case of counterterrorism policy. Global Constitutionalism, 1(2), 278-312.

Ignatieff, M. (2003). Human rights as politics and idolatry. New Jersey: Princeton University Press. p. 12

Indonesian Security and Countering Terrorism in Southeast Asia. (2003). Strategic Survey 103(1): 219–36.

Jackson, R. (2005). Writing the war on terrorism: Language, politics and counter-terrorism. Manchester University Press.

Khagram, S., Riker, J. V., & Sikkink, K. (2002). Restructuring world politics: transnational social movements, networks, and norms (Vol. 14). U of Minnesota Press.

KOMPAS (2000, 9 September) Awaloedin Djamin On Bomb Terror: Be Vigilant Against Actions of International Terrorists”, p. 8

KOMPAS (2001, 12 September) Possibility of Osama bin Laden’s Network in Indonesia Is Slim, p. 6.

KOMPAS (2002, 22 January) Again, the Philippines Captured An Al-Qaeda Associate, p. 2.

KOMPAS (2002, 31 January) The U.S. Started Terrorism War In The Philippines, p. 3.

KOMPAS (2002, 3 February) The U.S. Expected Indonesia to Act Strongly Against Terrorists, p. 1.

KOMPAS (2002, 23 February) Singapore Shocked By Indonesia’s Reaction On Terrorism, p. 1.

KOMPAS (2002, 24 May) Fujimura: Al Qaeda Exists in Indonesia, p. 1.

KOMPAS (2002, 19 October) Signed, Two Interim Laws on Anti-Terrorism, p. 2.

REPUBLIKA (2002, 19 October) Minister Mahendra: This Is Solely for Terrorism, Not Politics, p. 3.

KOMPAS (2002, 18 October) Ba’asyir Is Called In As A Suspect, p. 1.

KOMPAS (2002, 27 October) Jemaah Islamiyah Listed As The Terrorist By The United Nations, p. 3.

McBeth, J. (2003). Elite force. Far Eastern Economic Review, 166(45), 18-18.

McCawley, T (2000, 15 September). Jakarta Car Bomb 'Was a Military Device, Financial Times, p. 5, emphasis added.

Minister Yasonna Laoly, quoted in Amendment of Anti-Terrorism Regulations to Finish Soon, KOMPAS, 26 January 2016

Nedal, D. (2011). On ‘Theorising Terrorism’ A Reply to Colin Wight. International Relations, 25(2), 263-266.

Pisoiu, D. (2012). Pragmatic persuasion in counterterrorism. Critical Studies on Terrorism, 5(3), 297-317.

President’s Decree No. 4/2002.

Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, UN document A/CONF.183/9, 17 July 1998, articles 7,‘Crimes against humanity’.

Shanahan, T. (2016). The Definition of Terrorism. Routledge Handbook of Critical Terrorism Studies. London and New York: Routledge, 103-113.

TEMPO (2002, 28 January)m Ghozi, Al-Qaeda, and Megawati, p. 17.

UN (19 August 2014) Al-Qaida Sanctions List (http://www.un.org/sc/committees/1267/delisting. shtml, downloaded 19 August 2014) stipulated: “Jemaah Islamiyah operated in Indonesia, Malaysia, and the Philippines”.

Vaughn, B. et al. (2008). Terrorism in Southeast Asia. New York: Nova Science Publishers.

Wight, C. (2009). Theorising terrorism: the state, structure and history. International Relations, 23(1), 99-106.

Wolfendale, J. (2007). Terrorism, security, and the threat of counterterrorism. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 30(1), 75-92.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.